Harris describes the idea of
countering as pointing out shortcomings and arguing with an author not just for
arguments sake but only if your purpose is to add something or give an insight
of your own. The example he opens with reminds me of times when I have actually
had fights with my siblings about whether or not we were in a fight. Its
completely useless and that is exactly what Harris is saying; you need to have a
purpose for pointing out the flaws in another’s work, other than the fact you
believe yourself to be smarter and want to prove them wrong. Instead we should
use other authors arguments not to prove them wrong but to create an
intellectual counterargument of our own. A place where countering is often
unavoidable is any context that politics is involved. For example the blog, http://hipsterlibertarian.com/
entitled the Hipster Libertarian. The tumblr page is description reads, “I like
freedom, peace, and property. I don’t like corporatism, war, and the government
telling us how to live, no matter who is in office.” There is a clearly defined
argument and opinion running through this page created by Bonnie Kristian.
Throughout the blog there are numerous online discussions and arguments in
which she engages her followers about various topics that they may agree or
disagree on. I think this countering style adds something to her pages because
she is not just stating what she believes she is interacting with people who
possess different opinions than her own and not just saying ‘anyone who
believes differently than I do is wrong.’ The term that Harris came up with for the concept is very fitting and something that all writers can benefit from using.
No comments:
Post a Comment