Tuesday, February 12, 2013

The Continual Nature of Writing


“Academic writing is often described as a kind of conversation. You read a text, you talk about it, you put down some thoughts in response, others respond to your comments, and so on. Compares this idea to a person entering a room during a heated conversion that cannot be stopped to explain and yet every person has walked in and has not received any explanation of what they have missed. The individual takes part in the discussion and when they leave the discussion still continues. To me this reflects that writing is not being meant to have a definitive beginning or end but to just be a continual flow of information, ideas, and discussion. Something that anyone can pick up in the middle and add something of their own and then allow the next person to contribute another continuous thought.“It suggests that the goal of such writing is not to have the final word on the subject.” We do not want to end the conversation; we want to perpetuate it. I do not think any blog or any writing can really exist without the concept of forwarding. People have been writing for so long that most of what people can think to originally say has been said. Now it is just a matter of adding to the conversation, then other people adding to what you have contributed and so on and so on.

No comments:

Post a Comment